Journal
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages 175-185Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.013
Keywords
Multi-criteria analysis; Public policies; Environmental conflicts; Yasuni; Ecuador
Funding
- Institute for Environmental Sciences and Technologies (ICTA) at the Autonomous University of Barcelona [CSO2010-21979]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The Ecuadorian proposal to keep 846 million barrels of crude oil in the Yasuni National Park underground for the purposes of avoiding CO2 emissions and to protect both the biological diversity and the indigenous peoples in isolation who inhabit this area of the Amazon is evaluated from a multi-criteria analysis. The main purpose of the paper is to compare this policy option with other alternatives across different values. An analytical framework is used that recognises the inherent complexity of a problem of this nature, in which the financial values are indeed relevant for policy, but other values are also relevant: the economic (in a broad sense), social, environmental, cultural and political. The results confirm that from a financial standpoint, extracting the oil is preferable, but by incorporating the non-monetary values into the multi-criteria decision process, one can plausibly defend the Yasuni-ITT Initiative as the most desirable policy option. Indeed, the social and environmental benefits (or criteria) signalling an economic transition towards a model based on renewable sources of energy, along with the protection of critical environmental and social capital, make up for the financial gap. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available