4.4 Article

Noninvasive monitoring of blood glucose concentration in diabetic patients with optical coherence tomography

Journal

LASER PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1612-202X/aa58c0

Keywords

optical coherence tomography; OCT signal slope; correlation coefficient; diabetic patients; blood glucose concentration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60778047, 61335011, 61275187, 81071790]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20114407110001, 200805740003]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Project of the Education Department of Guangdong Province of China
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [06025080, 9251063101000009]
  5. Technique invention program of Guangdong Province [2013KJCX0052]
  6. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2012A080203008]
  7. Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Science and Technology for Medicine (Fujian Normal University), Ministry of Education, China [JYG1202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been used to noninvasively monitor the blood glucose concentration (BGC) in healthy subjects with good accuracy and acceptable specificity. Based on this, the paper further considered the possibility of OCT in noninvasive monitoring BGC in diabetic patients. The OCT signal slope (OCTSS) changed with variation of BGC. The correlation coefficient R between BGC and OCTSS in diabetic patients was 0.91; while the correlation coefficient R in healthy volunteers was 0.78. Thus, a better linear dependence of OCTSS on BGC in diabetic patients was presented in the experiment. The results showed that the capability and accuracy of OCT in noninvasive monitoring BGC of diabetic patients, and the noninvasive monitoring BGC in diabetic patients may be better than the monitoring in the healthy subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available