4.3 Article

Large losses in glacier area and water availability by the end of twenty-first century under high emission scenario, Satluj basin, Himalaya

Journal

CURRENT SCIENCE
Volume 116, Issue 10, Pages 1721-1730

Publisher

INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.18520/cs/v116/i10/1721-1730

Keywords

Climate change; glacier; glacier melt runoff; Himalaya; mass balance; Satluj basin; water availability

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India
  2. Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
  3. Sustaining Himalayan Water Resources in a Changing Climate (SusHi-Wat) project, India-UK Water Centre and Impacting Research Innovation and Technology (IMPRINT) programme, Government of India
  4. NERC [bas0100032, NE/N016394/1, NE/R000107/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glaciers in the Satluj river basin are likely to lose 53% and 81% of area by the end of the century, if climate change followed RCP 8.5 scenario of CNRM-CM5 and GFDL-CM3 models respectively. The large variability in area loss can be due to difference in temperature and precipitation projections. Presently, Satluj basin has approximately 2000 glaciers, 1426 sq. km glacier area and 62.3 Gt glacier stored water. The current mean specific mass balance is -0.40 m.w.e. a(-1 )This will change to -0.42 and - 1.1 m.w.e. a(-1) by 2090, if climate data of CNRM-CM5 and GFDL-CM3 are used respectively. We have used an extreme scenario of GFDL-CM3 model to assess the changes in the contribution of glacier melt to the Bhakra reservoir. Mass balance model suggests that glaciers are contributing 2 km(3) a(-1) out of 14 km(3) of water. This will increase to 2.2 km(3) a(-1) by 2050, and then reduce to 1.5 km(3) a(-1) by the end of the century. In addition, loss in glacier area by the end of century, will also increase the vulnerability of mountain communities, suggesting need for better adaptation and water management practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available