4.5 Review

Smoking and Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 127, Issue 8, Pages 1753-1761

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.26558

Keywords

Smoking; cigarette smoke; tobacco smoke; smell; olfaction

Funding

  1. University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [R01 ES022657]
  3. National Institute on Aging [R37 AG030481, R01 AG033903, K23 AG036762]
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Chronic Rhinosinusitis Integrative Studies Program) [U19 AI106683, P01 AI097092]
  5. Center on the Demography and Economics of Aging
  6. National Institutes of Health
  7. Office of Women's Health Research
  8. Office of AIDS Research
  9. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research [R01 AG021487]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives/Hypothesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was undertaken, examining the association between tobacco smoking and olfactory function in humans, utilizing PubMed and Web of Science (1970-2015) as data sources. Study Design: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Methods: This database review of studies of smoking and olfaction, with a focus on identifying high-quality studies (based on modified versions of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale), used validated olfactory tests among the generally healthy population. Results: We identified 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Of 10 cross-sectional studies, two were excluded from meta-analysis because the cohorts they studied were included in another article in the review. In meta-analysis, current smokers had substantially higher odds of olfactory dysfunction compared to never smokers (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37-1.85). In contrast, former smokers were found to have no difference in risk of impaired olfaction compared to never smokers (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.91-1.21). The single longitudinal study reviewed found a trend toward increased risk of olfactory decline over time in ever smokers; this trend was stronger in current as compared to former smokers. Conclusions: Current smoking, but not former smoking, is associated with significantly increased risk of olfactory dysfunction, suggesting that the effects of smoking on olfaction may be reversible. Future studies that prospectively evaluate the impact of smoking cessation on improvement in olfactory function are warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available