3.8 Proceedings Paper

The Guitar Rendition Ontology for Teaching and Learning Support

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ICSC.2019.00079

Keywords

the Guitar Rendition Ontology; musical performance techniques; action

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an ontology of musical performance techniques for teaching and learning support. We have attempted to support musical instrument performance from the viewpoint of knowledge-engineering. We focused on classical guitar which requires many techniques, and organized the knowledge related to guitar rendition by using a goal-oriented form of description. However, it presents several difficulties for use as a basis of knowledge-based systems such as a lack of coherence. In this study, we developed the Guitar Rendition Ontology that can serve as a guideline for classical guitar performance at learning and teaching sites. The ontology consists of 96 concepts, that describe the relationships between renditions, and 18 properties that explain the features of the concepts. We defined three properties to describe the process of action of each rendition as the core structure of guitar rendition concept: that is, action, primary-action, and conditional-action. The description form led to more appropriate expression of the action processes than the knowledge we systematized in our previous work. We significantly improved machine-readability and machine-processability by using Ontology Web Language (OWL). Moreover, we investigated some issues with the ontology in order to improve it through interviewing teachers and learners. As a result, we acquired additional information and found several problems with the domain of guitar rendition and the representation of knowledge. Furthermore, we received positive responses concerning the possibility of using the ontology on site. Finally, we described an annotation method for integrating data between the ontology and score information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available