4.7 Article

Effects of emerald ash borer on municipal forestry budgets

Journal

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 98-105

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.023

Keywords

Economic analysis; Emerald ash borer; Fraxinus; Municipal-budget; Urban Forest Management

Funding

  1. TREE Fund
  2. Wisconsin Arborist Association
  3. University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point (UWSP) College of Natural Resources
  4. UWSP Office of Sponsored Research
  5. USDA-Forest Service
  6. USDA McIntire-Stennis Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the financial impact of emerald ash borer (EAB, Agrilus planipennis Farimaire; Coleoptera: Buprestide) on municipal forestry budgets. Three distinct phases were evident: an initial time period of 0-4-years (little budget change), year 5-8 time period (rapid budget increase), and years 9-12 (rapid budget decrease) after EAB was confirmed in a state. The 5-8 year time period had increased spending as detected through the total forestry budget (p =0.011), total municipal forestry budget (percent forestry budget) as a percentage of the total municipal budget (p <0.001), and per capita spending (p <0.001). A $1.58 per capita increase occurred in annual municipal forestry budgets in states in which EAB was confirmed (EAB+) compared to states without a confirmed EAB case (EAB-). This has a $280.5 (+/- 79.9) million annual impact on municipal budgets. The percent forestry budget increased as the time since EAB was confirmed in a state increased. A mean 0.33% (0.03 SE, n=82) percent forestry budget occurred during the initial 0-4 years after confirmation of EAB. This exponentially increased from 0.47% (0.05 SE, n=43) in year 5 to 1.17% (0.12 SE, n=38) at the peak in year 8, and rapidly declined back to 0.47% (0.05 SE, n=51) in years 10-12 which was a level slightly higher than initial conditions. Federal, state, and local urban forestry managers can use these results to financially plan for the impacts of EAB on municipal forestry budgets. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available