4.7 Review

Future cancer research priorities in the USA: a Lancet Oncology Commission

Journal

LANCET ONCOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages E653-E706

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30698-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Abbvie
  3. Schlesinger Health Associates
  4. Precision Health Economics
  5. Millennium Takeda
  6. Gilead
  7. Arcus and FlxBio
  8. Juno
  9. Pfizer
  10. NuMedii
  11. Personalis
  12. Roche
  13. Genentech
  14. G ealthcare and Blue Earth Diagnostics
  15. Gealthcare
  16. Blue Earth Diagnostics
  17. Siemens Heathcare
  18. Aduro Biotech
  19. Sharecare
  20. Varian Medical Systems
  21. Redhill Biopharma
  22. Merck
  23. MedImmune
  24. Immunocore
  25. Sun Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We are in the midst of a technological revolution that is providing new insights into human biology and cancer. In this era of big data, we are amassing large amounts of information that is transforming how we approach cancer treatment and prevention. Enactment of the Cancer Moonshot within the 21st Century Cures Act in the USA arrived at a propitious moment in the advancement of knowledge, providing nearly US$ 2 billion of funding for cancer research and precision medicine. In 2016, the Blue Ribbon Panel (BRP) set out a roadmap of recommendations designed to exploit new advances in cancer diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Those recommendations provided a high-level view of how to accelerate the conversion of new scientific discoveries into effective treatments and prevention for cancer. The US National Cancer Institute is already implementing some of those recommendations. As experts in the priority areas identified by the BRP, we bolster those recommendations to implement this important scientific roadmap. In this Commission, we examine the BRP recommendations in greater detail and expand the discussion to include additional priority areas, including surgical oncology, radiation oncology, imaging, health systems and health disparities, regulation and financing, population science, and oncopolicy. We prioritise areas of research in the USA that we believe would accelerate efforts to benefit patients with cancer. Finally, we hope the recommendations in this report will facilitate new international collaborations to further enhance global efforts in cancer control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available