4.6 Article

Modeling and analysis of transport and reaction in washcoated monoliths: Cu-SSZ-13 SCR and dual-layer Cu-SSZ-13+Pt/Al2O3 ASC

Journal

REACTION CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 1103-1115

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8re00325d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cummins Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modeling and analysis of washcoated single-and dual-layer monolith catalysts is presented for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) on Cu-SSZ-13 and ammonia oxidation on Cu-SSZ-13 + Pt/Al2O3 ammonia slip catalyst (ASC). This work is a follow-up of the recent experimental study of enhanced transport in porositymodified washcoated monoliths (Dhillon et al.). A 1 + 1 dimensional reactor model containing tuned multistep kinetic formulations is utilized to simulate SCR and ASC performance for understanding and optimization. The SCR kinetic model combines multi-step Eley-Rideal kinetics with a dual-site description and the model parameters are systematically tuned to data sets for NH3 uptake and TPD, steady state NH3 + O2 oxidation, and standard SCR (NH3 + NO + O-2), the latter including differential kinetics. The SCR model is validated for a range of operating conditions and catalyst compositions. Among other findings, the dualsite SCR model predicts the two peaks during NH3 desorption and captures the sea gull shaped conversion versus temperature dependence, underscoring the predominance of the two active sites. The model is used to simulate the performance of the modified porosity Cu-SSZ-13 washcoat for SCR on the singlelayer catalyst and for SCR + ammonia oxidation on the dual-layer ASC. The model predicts that a similar to 50% increase in the effective diffusivity serves to enhance the conversion in the intermediate temperature regime in which washcoat diffusion is controlling. The SCR and ASC findings provide direction for further catalyst and reactor optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available