4.3 Article

Decreased Injection Site Pain Associated with Phosphate-Free Etanercept Formulation in Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY AND THERAPY
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 245-254

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40744-019-0152-8

Keywords

Etanercept; Injection site pain; Phosphate-free formulation; Psoriatic arthritis; Rheumatoid arthritis; Subcutaneous injection

Categories

Funding

  1. Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
  2. Amgen Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IntroductionEtanercept, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and is administered via subcutaneous injection. Injection site pain (ISP) associated with subcutaneous administration may affect compliance or hinder initiation of prescribed medications. To improve the patient experience, a new phosphate-free formulation of etanercept was evaluated for reduced ISP associated with administration.MethodsThis phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study compared the prior formulation of etanercept to a phosphate-free formulation. Etanercept-naive adults with RA or PsA indicated for treatment with etanercept were eligible. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive both etanercept formulations (50mg) in one of two crossover sequences: prior formulation followed by phosphate-free formulation (sequence AB) or phosphate-free formulation followed by prior formulation (sequence BA) at visits 1week apart. Patients self-reported ISP using a fit-for-purpose 100-mm visual analog scale within 30s after injection. Safety outcomes included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Mixed-effects analysis of variance model was used to assess ISP, with treatment, study period, sequence, and disease indication as fixed-effect covariates and patient-within-sequence as random effect.ResultsA total of 111 patients enrolled (56 sequence AB; 55 sequence BA). Mean ISP score for prior formulation was 23.1mm and for phosphate-free formulation was 19.1mm (mean difference -4mm; 95% confidence interval: -8.0, 0.0; P=0.048). Patients with the highest ISP scores from the prior formulation (by quartile cut points) had the largest reduction in pain with phosphate-free formulation. Injection site reactions were few in number and similar between formulations; no new safety signals were observed.ConclusionsThe new phosphate-free formulation of etanercept had statistically significantly lower mean pain scores than the prior formulation, with largest pain reductions observed among patients who reported highest pain with the prior formulation.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02986139.FundingAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA USA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available