4.7 Article

Data classification using evidence reasoning rule

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 144-151

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.11.001

Keywords

Date classification; Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DST); Evidential reasoning (ER) rule; Reliability and weight of evidence; Sequential linear programming (SLP)

Funding

  1. NSFC [61433001, 61374123, 61573076, 61573275, 71573071, U1509203]
  2. Zhejiang Province Research Program Project of Commonweal Technology Application [201601071]
  3. University Students' Scientific and Technological Innovation Activity Plan of Zhejiang province (Xin-Miao Talent plan)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DST) based classifier design, Dempster's combination (DC) rule is commonly used as a multi-attribute classifier to combine evidence collected from different attributes. The main aim of this paper is to present a classification method using a novel combination rule i.e., the evidence reasoning (ER) rule. As an improvement of the DC rule, the newly proposed ER rule defines the reliability and weight of evidence. The former indicates the ability of attribute or its evidence to provide correct assessment for classification problem, and the latter reflects the relative importance of evidence in comparison with other evidence when they need to be combined. The ER rule-based classification procedure is expatiated from evidence acquisition and estimation of evidence reliability and weight to combination of evidence. It is a purely data-driven approach without making any assumptions about the relationships between attributes and class memberships, and the specific statistic distributions of attribute data. Experiential results on five popular benchmark databases taken from University of California Irvine (UCI) machine learning database show high classification accuracy that is competitive with other classical and mainstream classifiers. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available