4.3 Article

ACL graft metabolic activity assessed by 18FDG PET-MRI

Journal

KNEE
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 792-797

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.04.008

Keywords

ACL reconstruction; Ligamentization; Magnetic resonance imaging; Positron emission tomography; (18)FDG

Funding

  1. Ohio Third Frontier grants [TECH 09-028, TECH 10-012, TECH 11-044, TECH 13-060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To demonstrate the use of (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination ((18)FDG-PET) to assess the metabolic activity of ACL graft tissue and evaluate the utility of this technique for ligament imaging. Methods: Twenty-one knees with intact ACL grafts in 19 patients at multiple time points following ACL reconstruction were recruited to participate. PET-MRI imaging was performed using a custom device to place knees in the same position for both studies. Images were co-registered for quantification of (18)FDG-PET standardized uptake value (SUV) for the proximal, middle, and distal ACL was quantified. Signal in extra-articular muscle tissue in the index knee was also recorded as a control. Signal from each location was compared based on how far post-operative each knee was from ACL reconstruction (<6 months, six to 12 months, 12-24 months, or >24 months). Results: Significant differences in (18)FDG PET SUV between the four time points were observed in the proximal (p = 0.02), middle (p = 0.004), and distal (p = 0.007) portions of the ACL graft. The greater than 24 months group was noted to be different from other groups in each case. No difference in PET 18FDG SUV was noted in the extra-articular muscle in the index knee in each time group (p = 0.61). Conclusions: Metabolic activity was noted to be significantly lower in grafts imaged greater than two years post-reconstruction relative to those grafts that had been in place for shorter periods of time. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available