4.4 Article

A mixed methods exploration of the relationships between the racial identity, science identity, science self-efficacy, and science achievement of African American students at HBCUs

Journal

CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 54-71

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.11.006

Keywords

Self-efficacy; Science identity; Racial identity; Critical race theory; HBCU; African American; Mixed methods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Utilizing a Critical Race Mixed Methodology framework, the purpose of this concurrent (QUANT + qual) mixed methods study was to investigate the relationships between the racial identity, science identity, science self efficacy beliefs, and science achievement of 347 African American college students who attend historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs). The quantitative data identified several statistically significant relationships between science identity, racial identity, science self-efficacy, and science achievement. The results of a path analysis suggested that college science achievement is significantly explained by science identity (indirect effect = 0.09, p < 0.01), and marginally by racial identity measures (centrality, nationalist, and public regard), with science self-efficacy serving as a mediator. In the qualitative strand, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 students from the quantitative strand in order to corroborate the findings between the two methods. The qualitative data revealed that HBCUs facilitate the development of the constructs of interest by establishing Black racial cohesion and Black science cohesion, as well as by building students' science cultural capital. Overall the qualitative findings corroborated several key quantitative findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available