4.7 Article

Age, Race, and Gender Factors in Incident Disability

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glx194

Keywords

Disablement process; Physical function; Health disparities; Minority aging

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HHSN268201200036C, HHSN268200800007C, N01HC-55222, N01HC85079, N01HC85080, N01HC85081, N01HC85082, N01HC85083, N01HC85086, HL080295]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute on Aging [AG023629]
  3. University of Pittsburgh Claude
  4. D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center [P30-AG-024827]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Incident disability rates enable the comparison of risk across populations. Understanding these by age, sex, and race is important for planning for the care of older adults and targeting prevention. Methods: We calculated incident disability rates among older adults in the Cardiovascular Health Study, a study of 5,888 older adults aged >= 65 years over 6 years of follow-up. Disability was defined in the following two ways: (i) self-report of disability (severe difficulty or inability) in any of six Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and (ii) mobility difficulty (any difficulty walking half a mile or climbing 10 steps). Incident disability rates were calculated as events per 100 person years for age, gender, and race groups. Results: The incidence of ADL disability, and mobility difficulty were 2.7 (2.5-2.8), and 9.8 (9.4-10.3) events per 100 person years. Women, older participants, and blacks had higher rates in both domains. Conclusion: Incidence rates are considerably different based on the domain examined as well as age, race, and gender composition of the population. Prevention efforts should focus on high risk populations and attempt to ameliorate factors that increase risk in these groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available