4.7 Article

Validation of Gait Characteristics Extracted From Raw Accelerometry During Walking Against Measures of Physical Function, Mobility, Fatigability, and Fitness

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glx174

Keywords

Wearable accelerometers; Actigraphy; Physical performance; Gait; Walking; Observational studies

Funding

  1. Pittsburgh Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Research Registry, and Developmental Pilot Grant [NIH P30 AG024826, NIH P30 AG024827]
  2. National Institute on Aging Professional Services [HHSN271201100605P]
  3. NIA Aging Training Grant [T32-AG-000181]
  4. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging
  5. NIH from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [RO1 NS085211]
  6. NIH grant from the National Institute of Mental Health [RO1 MH095836]
  7. NIH grant from National Heath, Lung and Blood Institute [R01 HL123407]
  8. NIMH grant [R01 MH108467]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Data collected by wearable accelerometry devices can be used to identify periods of sustained harmonic walking. This report aims to establish whether the features of walking identified in the laboratory and free-living environments are associated with each other as well as measures of physical function, mobility, fatigability, and fitness. Methods: Fifty-one older adults (mean age 78.31) enrolled in the Developmental Epidemiologic Cohort Study were included in the analyses. The study included an in-the-lab component as well as 7 days of monitoring in-the-wild (free living). Participants were equipped with hip-worn Actigraph GT3X+ activity monitors, which collect raw accelerometry data. We applied a walking identification algorithm and defined features of walking, including participant-specific walking acceleration and cadence. The association between these walking features and physical function, mobility, fatigability, and fitness was quantified using linear regression analysis. Results: Acceleration and cadence estimated from in-the-lab and in-the-wild data were significantly associated with each other (p < .05). However, walking acceleration in-the-lab was on average 96% higher than in-the-wild, whereas cadence in-the-lab was on average 20% higher than in-the-wild. Acceleration and cadence were associated with measures of physical function, mobility, fatigability, and fitness (p < .05) in both in-the-lab and in-the-wild settings. In addition, in-the-wild daily walking time was associated with fitness (p < .05). Conclusions: The quantitative difference in proposed walking features indicates that participants may overperform when observed in-the-lab. Also, proposed features of walking were significantly associated with measures of physical function, mobility, fatigability, and fitness, which provides evidence of convergent validity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available