4.5 Article

Recycled ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate pretreatment for enhancing enzymatic saccharification of softwood without cellulose regeneration

Journal

JOURNAL OF WOOD SCIENCE
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 149-156

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10086-017-1681-9

Keywords

1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate; Softwood; Cellulose regeneration; Enzymatic saccharification; Cellulose crystallinity

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [JP26660138]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, pretreatment of wood meals using a recycled ionic liquid (IL), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([Emim]Ac), enhanced glucose liberation by enzymatic saccharification, without dissolution of cellulose and lignin. In contrast, previous studies on IL pretreatment have mostly focused on lignocellulosic dissolution to regenerate cellulose and removing lignin. Softwood (Cryptomeria japonica) was pretreated with [Emim]Ac at 60-100 A degrees C for 2-8 h without collecting regenerated cellulose. The pretreatment did not have a strong effect on wood component dissolution (weight of residues: 91.7-98.8%). The residues contained relatively high amounts of lignin (26.6-32.6%) with low adsorption of [Emim]Ac (0.9-2.7%). Meanwhile, the crystallinity index (C (r) I) of cellulose in the wood was significantly reduced by pretreatment, from 50.9% to 28.4-37.1%. In spite of the high lignin contents in the residues, their glucose liberation values by enzymatic saccharification using a cellulase mixture were 3-16 times greater than that of untreated wood. A good correlation was found between the saccharification effectiveness of pretreated samples and the C (r) I. Although lignin dissolved in [Emim]Ac continued to accumulate after repeated use of [Emim]Ac, the pretreatment was found to be effective for three consecutive cycles without the need to remove the dissolved materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available