4.7 Article

Coseismic slip on shallow decollement megathrusts: implications for seismic and tsunami hazard

Journal

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 45-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.003

Keywords

Earthquakes; Decollement; Subduction zone; Fold-and-thrust belt; Seismogenic zone; Faults

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Singapore under the NRF Fellowship scheme [NRF-NRFF2013-06]
  2. EOS
  3. National Research Foundation of Singapore
  4. Singapore Ministry of Education under the Research Centres of Excellence initiative
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences [1261833] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For years, many studies of subduction zones and on-land fold-and-thrust belts have assumed that the frontal portions of accretionary prisms are too weak to rupture coseismically and must therefore be fully creeping. We present a series of examples, both on-land and offshore, demonstrating that in many cases, shallow decollements are capable of large, coseismic slip events that rupture to the toes of the fault systems. Some of these events are associated with ruptures that initiate down-dip, while others appear to be limited to the frontal, shallow portion of the wedge. We suggest that this behavior is not limited to the examples described here, but rather is common to many (perhaps most) accretionary wedges and fold-and-thrust belts around the world. Indeed, there may be many other examples of similar earthquakes, where existing data cannot constrain slip at the toe. We do not characterize the regions and events described here as unusual, as they encompass a wide range of settings. This study indicates that there is an urgent need to reevaluate seismic and tsunami hazard in fold-and-thrust belts and subduction zones around the world, allowing for the possibility of shallow decollement rupture. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available