4.2 Article

Outcomes of Suction Curettage Versus Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Hydatidiform Mole Among Women Aged 40 Years or Older

Journal

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 64, Issue 5-6, Pages 188-192

Publisher

SCI PRINTERS & PUBL INC

Keywords

adult; clinical protocols; female; gestational trophoblastic disease; hydatidiform mole; hysterectomy; invasive mole; pregnancy; treatment outcome; trophoblastic neoplasms

Funding

  1. Grant for International Research Integration: Research Pyramid, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University
  2. Placental Related Diseases Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) in hydatidiform mole patients aged >= 40 years treated by suction curettage versus hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: All cases of hydatidiform mole among women aged >= 40 years treated at 2 university hospitals in Bangkok, Thailand, between 2000-2015 were reviewed. Clinical data, case management, and outcomes of treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight cases of hydatidiform mole patients met criteria. Twenty cases were treated by primary suction curettage, and 18 cases underwent primary hysterectomy. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between groups. Average uterine size was significantly larger in the hysterectomy group (14.9 vs. 12.6 weeks, p=0.02). Postmolar GTN developed in 13 of 38 cases (34.21%), with 8 of 20 (40%) in the suction curettage group and 5 of 18 (27.8%) in the hysterectomy group (p = 0.43). Five cases received hysterectomy as secondary surgery. From 23 hysterecto- my specimens, invasive mole was identified in 10 cases (43.5%) and choriocarcinoma in 1 case. CONCLUSION: Risk of postmolar GTN was not significantly different when comparing suction curettage and hysterectomy as primary treatment. Almost half of hysterectomy specimens revealed invasive mole, which may explain why there is an increase of GTN in older patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available