4.3 Article

Measuring the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) in the Program Praat

Journal

JOURNAL OF VOICE
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.01.002

Keywords

Dysphonia Severity Index; Praat; Multi-Dimensional Voice Program; Voice Range Profile; Variability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The original Dysphonia Severity Index (ie, DSI) weighs and combines four voice markers in a single number to size dysphonia gradation in the clinic: percent jitter (from Multi-Dimensional Voice Program; KayPENTAX Corp., Montvale, NJ), softest intensity and highest fundamental frequency (both from Voice Range Profile; KayPENTAX Corp.), and maximum phonation time. To be more generally applied, however, implementation of DSI in the program Praat (Paul Boersma and David Weenink, Institute for Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands) would be advantageous for all voice clinicians. The presented project was therefore designed (1) to develop such a Praat application and (b) to test its concurrent validity. Methods. The four voice markers for the original DSI, as well as ten additional voice markers in Praat, were administered on a total of 49 subjects in three different clinical voice centers. A crossover research design was implemented to counterbalance for possible exercise effects. First, stepwise multiple linear regression was applied to build a statistical model with the best combination of Praat predictors for the original DSI. Second, correlation statistics were applied to compare Praat's DSI with the original DSI. Results. Both DSI versions correlated strongly. A custom script was therefore written for automated DSI determination in Praat. Conclusion. With this script, every voice clinician can easily determine DSI in the Praat program.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available