4.3 Article

Wine tourism apps as wine destination branding instruments: content and functionality analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM TECHNOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 136-152

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JHTT-10-2017-0115

Keywords

Functionality; Destination; Branding; Wine; Content; Douro; Android

Funding

  1. European and Structural Investment Funds (FEDER) [01-0145-FEDER-000038]
  2. Norte 2020 (Programa Operacional Regional do Norte) [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006971]
  3. FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [UID/SOC/04011/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the competitiveness through brand enhancement of the Douro wine tourism apps in light of their content and functionality in comparison to international wine tourism apps. Design/methodology/approach The content and functionality features of both the Douro and international wine apps are evaluated to determine any statistically significant differences between items. A frequency analysis and chi-square are calculated at item and variable levels, a Shapiro-Wilks test is used to test normality and an independent t-test is deployed to examine the differences in customer ratings and number of downloads. Findings There is a significant difference between the Douro and international wine apps on an item level, although there is no significant difference between the groups with regard to their content and functionality features in general. Social implications Practical guidelines are proposed for wine tourism marketers and managers wishing to upgrade their destination brand image and its services to satisfy demanding wine tourists. Originality/value The study contributes to the literature about mobile apps in tourism with a content and functionality analysis of wine apps as variables in the technology acceptance model and of their impact on destination branding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available