4.7 Article

Grain size and hydrodynamic sorting controls on the composition of basaltic sediments: Implications for interpreting martian soils

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 423, Issue -, Pages 67-77

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.03.052

Keywords

Mars soil; sorting; sediment composition; basalt; transport

Funding

  1. University of Tennessee Faculty Development Award
  2. Geological Society of America Graduate Student Research Grant
  3. NASA Mars Fundamental Research Program [MFRP12-0049]
  4. NASA Mars Exploration Rovers Cornell [39361-6446]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impact shattering of bedrock and wind-driven sorting have been identified as primary processes modifying the size, shape, and roundness of basalt-derived sediments at the Spirit rover landing site in Gusev Crater, Mars. We experimentally explore how physical sorting can cause significant compositional modification of sediment relative to bedrock in the absence of chemical weathering. Two basalt samples, chosen to provide a range of source rock compositions and textures, were crushed and sieved. We quantify variations in sediment mineral proportions as a function of grain size, as well as accompanying changes in major- and trace-element geochemistry. Redistribution of phenocrysts imposes the primary compositional control on basalt-derived sediments, although minor mineral fractionations affect trace-element concentrations. Olivine accumulation pairs with increasing MgO, Fe2O3(T), Ni, and Co, and Al2O3 depletion. The observed chemical changes in physically sorted sediments in our experiments mimic those measured in martian soils. Aeolian transport models demonstrate that sorting of mineral components of basalts under martian conditions is likely. Given the potential for sorting by winds on Mars we argue that sorting must be considered, in addition to chemical weathering, when interpreting the geochemical changes in martian sediments. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available