4.7 Article

Nanopore separator of cross-linked poly(propylene glycol)-co-pentaerythritol triacrylate for effectively suppressing polysulfide shuttling in Li-S batteries

Journal

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
Volume 10, Issue 21, Pages 2697-2705

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9py00206e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51473186, 51803240]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [201802010009]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [161gpy17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have attracted tremendous attention as the next generation of lithium batteries. In the battery construction, a nanopore separator can improve the performance of the Li-S battery by working as a nanofiltration film, inhibiting the migration of soluble polysulfide ions between the electrodes. Herein, a new strategy to synthesize a nanopore separator of poly(propylene glycol)-co-pentaerythritol triacrylate (PPG-co-PETA) particles to suppress polysulfide shuttling has been proposed. The PPG-co-PETA cross-linked particles were easily obtained by a facile approach of UV-induced monomer polymerization while implementing molecular cross-linking for nanopore control. The characteristic nanopore size of the PPG-co-PETA separator ranged from similar to 1.24 nm to similar to 1.86 nm upon changing the type of photo-initiator and content of cross-linking agent. The results showed that the optimized separator for a Li-S battery could possess an electrolyte uptake of 350% with excellent thermal, mechanical and electrochemical properties. Notably, the Li-S battery using such a new type of nanopore separator exhibits superior retention discharge capacity (> 200 cycles). It is believed that the nanopore separator of cross-linked PPG-co-PETA is a potential alternative to the commercial Celgard separator for effectively blocking polysulfide shuttling in Li-S batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available