4.1 Article

Mechanism of M-cell differentiation accelerated by proliferation of indigenous bacteria in rat Peyer's patches

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 79, Issue 11, Pages 1826-1835

Publisher

JAPAN SOC VET SCI
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.17-0470

Keywords

immunohistochemistry; indigenous bacteria; M-cell differentiation; Peyer's patch; rat

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15K07766, 16K18813]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26310309, 15K07766, 16K18813] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism by which indigenous bacteria on the follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) of lymphatic follicles (LFs) accelerate the differentiation of microvillous columnar epithelial cells (MV) into M-cells was immunohistochemically investigated in rat Peyer's patches. The results showed that the number of Toll-like receptor (TLR) -4(+) M-cells was greater in the FAE with expansion of bacterial colonies (LFs with bacterial colonies on the FAE: b-LF) than the FAE without expansion of bacterial colonies (nb-LF). TLR-4 was also expressed in the striated borders of MV upstream next to M-cells in the FAE of the b-LF. TLR-4(+) vesicles were frequently detected in the cytoplasms of MV with TLR-4(+) striated borders upstream next to TLR-4(+) M-cells in the FAE of b-LF. These findings suggest that TLR-4(+) MV take up TLR-4 ligands and differentiate into M-cells in the b-LF. Neither the distribution of RANK nor that of RANKL was coincident with that of M-cells in the b-LF. Moreover, RANK, but not RANKL, was expressed in intestinal villi, whereas cleaved caspase-3 was immunonegative in the MV and M-cells of the FAE, unlike in villous epithelial cells. Therefore, RANK/RANKL signaling in the LF might contribute to the down-regulation of epithelial apoptosis to facilitate the differentiation of MV into M-cells in rat Peyer's patches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available