4.7 Article

Are continental adakites derived from thickened or foundered lower crust?

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 419, Issue -, Pages 125-133

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.02.036

Keywords

continental adakite; source inheritance; North China Craton

Funding

  1. NSFC [41130315, 91214204, 91014007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The geochemical signatures of adakites are usually attributed to high-pressure (>= 50 km) partial melting of mafic rocks, and accordingly the occurrence of adakitic magmas in continental settings is frequently used as an indicator of a thickened or foundered lower crust at the time of magma emplacement. These premises are built on experiments and modeling using an MORB-like source, but the probable source of continental adakites (i.e., continental lower crust) is compositionally different from MORB. To elucidate the effect of source inheritance and pressure on resultant melts, geochetnical analyses and trace-element modeling have been carried out on Jurassic adakitic rocks from the northern part of the North China Craton. The results show that these continental adakitic melts can be generated at depths less than 40 km, and their adakitic signature is most likely inherited from their source rocks. Such conclusions can be applied to the Mesozoic adakitic magmas from the interior of the North China Craton. Only the adakites from collisional orogens (i.e., Tibet, Dabie UHP belt) require crustal melting at depths greater than 50 km, consistent with collision-induced crustal thickening in these areas. This study therefore highlights the importance of source composition when defining the formation conditions of magmatic rocks in general, and in particular questions the common use of adakites as an indicator of specific geodynamic situations. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available