4.0 Article

European wildcat and domestic cat: Do they really differ?

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.09.006

Keywords

wild felid; house cat; species-specific behavior; behavioral repertoire

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The wildcat (Felis silvestris) is considered a strictly protected species, and it is included in CITES Appendix II. Nevertheless, it is classed as threatened in many European countries. Improving our knowledge on the behavior of the European wildcat might be valuable for the conservation of this species in the wild as well as for its husbandry in captive environment. The aim of this study was to enhance biological and behavioral knowledge of the European wildcat by comparing its behavior with that of the domestic cat. Individual and social behaviors of a group of Europeanwildcats in captivity were observed and compared with behaviors of a domestic cats' group to underline similarities and differences. Six European wildcats housed at Parco Natura Viva and 5 domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) were the subjects of this study. Two 10-minute daily sessions per subject were run. For each subject, a total of 120 minutes of observational data were collected. Individual and social behaviors of the 2 groups were recorded. A continuous focal animal sampling method was used to assess the amount of time spent in all behaviors. Results of this study underline that both captive wildcats and domestic cats showed species-specific behaviors. However, captive wildcats performed more not observed, vigilance, and scent marking than domestic cats, whereas domestic cats performed more individual sleeping than captive wildcats. In conclusion, findings of this study seem to suggest that behavioral differences between European wildcat and domestic cat are less common than are their similarities. However, further research on the behavior of wildcats is needed to improve the ex situ and in situ conservation of this species. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available