4.7 Article

Two crustal low-velocity channels beneath SE Tibet revealed by joint inversion of Rayleigh wave dispersion and receiver functions

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 415, Issue -, Pages 16-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.020

Keywords

Tibet; low-velocity zone; crustal flow; Rayleigh wave; receiver function; joint inversion

Funding

  1. China National Special Fund for Earthquake Scientific Research in Public Interest [201308011, 201008001]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M521046]
  3. Key Laboratory of Seismic Observation and Geophysical Imaging (SOGI) [2013 FUDA01]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of China [41274056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Competing geodynamic models, such as rigid-block extrusion, continuous deformation, and the mid-lower crustal flow, have been proposed to describe the growth and expansion of eastern Tibet. However, the dynamic processes responsible for plateau evolution and deformation remain poorly understood partly due to resolution limitations of previous models of lithospheric structure. On the basis of joint inversion of Rayleigh wave dispersion and receiver functions using data from a newly deployed seismic array, we have obtained a high-resolution 3D image that reveals the distribution of low-velocity zones (LVZs) with unprecedented clarity. The prominent feature of our model is two low-velocity channels that bound major strike-slip faults in SE Tibet and wrap around the Eastern Himalaya Syntaxis, consistent with the clockwise movement of crustal material in this region. Most large earthquakes in this region occurred in the boundaries of the LVZs. We propose that ductile flow within these channels, in addition to shear motion along strike-slip faults, played a significant role in accommodating intensive lithospheric deformation during the eastward expansion of Tibet in the Cenozoic. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available