4.6 Article

Understanding Electrolyte Decomposition of Graphite/NCM811 Cells at Elevated Operating Voltage

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 166, Issue 10, Pages A1853-A1859

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0571910jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BASF SE Scientific Network on Electrochemistry and Batteries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cells containing LiNixCoyMn1-x-yO2 (NCM) materials with very high nickel content suffer from cathode material degradation upon cycling, especially when operating these cells at higher voltage. While the cathode particle degradation is a problem other issues contribute to electrochemical performance loss. Graphite/LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cells have been cycled to different upper cutoff voltages and investigated with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), gas analysis with online electrochemical mass spectroscopy (OEMS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, gas chromatography with MS (GCMS) and inductively coupled plasma MS (ICP-MS). Increased gas evolution was observed when the upper cutoff voltage was increased from 4.2 to 4.6 V. An increase in O-2 evolution upon cycling as well as an increase of CO2 upon increasing the voltage, have been observed. More electrolyte decomposition products are observed on the anode for cells cycled to higher voltage. An increased amount of nickel has been detected on the graphite electrode in accordance with an increased reaction of the cathode surface with the electrolyte leading to transition metal dissolution. Finally, an increase in carbonate solvent transesterification products has been observed. (c) The Author(s) 2019. Published by ECS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse of the work in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available