4.7 Article

Forecasting vulnerability of deep extraction level excavations to draw-induced cave loads

Journal

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.07.006

Keywords

Block caving; Panel caving; Extraction level; Draw control; Squeezing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Block and panel caving methods are increasingly used for mining of large and strong orebodies at large depths below the ground surface (> 1 km). This paper focuses on the production phase of caving when the extraction level is fully developed and subjected to the weight of overlying caved material. A limit equilibrium solution for estimation of cave loads is critically reviewed and combined with existing empirical tools in order to forecast extraction level performance under cave loading. The analysis results, presented in nomogram form, suggest that the risk of severe squeezing of extraction level tunnels does not increase with cave depths below 500-1000 m due to the beneficial effects of arching. Under normal extraction ratios (ER = similar to 50%), severe squeezing experienced from cave loads in deep mines appears to be unlikely in all but the weakest rock masses (sigma(cm) < 5 MPa, where scm is the rock mass global strength), even with poor draw control or low drawpoint availability. The likelihood of severe squeezing is greater when large draw areas (HR = 50-75 m, where HR is the hydraulic radius) are combined with low drawpoint availability or poor draw control and locally higher extraction ratios (ER = similar to 75%), even in better quality rock (sigma(cm) = 5-10 MPa). The analysis results are back-analyzed with the extraction level performance before and after a doubling production of rate and draw area at the deep ore zone (DOZ) mine in Indonesia. The extraction level conditions predicted by the nomograms correlate well with the experience at the DOZ, in which extraction level damage increases significantly over the production rampup, accompanied by a significant drop in drawpoint availability. (C) 2018 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available