3.8 Article

Kinetic Study of Saponin Extraction from Sapindus rarak DC by Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Methods

Journal

Publisher

UNIV DIPONEGORO
DOI: 10.9767/bcrec.14.2.4253.468-477

Keywords

Saponin; Sapindus rarak DC; Ultrasound-assisted extraction; Extraction kinetics study

Funding

  1. Diponegoro University
  2. International Publication Research PNBP research grant of Diponegoro University [385100/UN7.P4.3/PP/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Saponin is an important plant-derived compound that is commonly found in sapindaceae plants, such as Sapindus rarak DC. Saponin is extensively used in plenty of industries as a detergent or emulsifying agent in cleansers, shampoos, and cosmetics. The extraction of saponin was previously studied and shows that the extraction assisted by ultrasonic waves was found to be an effective method. However, the previous studies have rarely examined the extraction kinetic study of the ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE). In the present study, the extraction of saponin from Sapindus rarak DC and its extraction kinetics is conducted. The results show that the highest saponin yield of 354.92 (mg of saponin per gram of dry feed) was obtained from the extraction using a solid-to-liquid (S/L) ratio of 1: 50 (w/v) at 50 degrees C. The amount of extracted saponin increased with the increase of extraction temperature as well as the solute ratio in the solution. However, increasing the temperature to 60 degrees C decreased the saponin yield. The results of a simple kinetics study of saponin extraction also show that the second-order kinetics model can better describe the UAE process, with an R-2 value of 0.929 and a rate coefficient of 0.00495 L.g(-1).min(-1). The experimental results agree well with the practical calculations obtained using the second-order kinetics model based on an average error of 6.79%. Copyright (c) 2019 BCREC Group. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available