4.6 Article

Theoretical calculations, molecular dynamics simulations and experimental investigation of the adsorption of cadmium(ii) on amidoxime-chelating cellulose

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 7, Issue 22, Pages 13714-13726

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta03622a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51508206]
  2. Guangzhou Science & Technology Project [201803030001]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong province [2018A030313363, 2015A030310328]
  4. Shenzhen Science & Technology Project [JCYJ 20160415114215737]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amidoxime-chelating cellulose (ACCS) was obtained through comprehensive modification, i.e. alkalization, etherification, amination and chelating; then, the adsorption of cadmium(II) was investigated by batch experiments, characterization, computational theoretical calculations and molecular dynamics simulations. Isothermal adsorption showed that the Freundlich equation described the adsorption data well at pH 5.0 and 7.0, whereas the Langmuir model was in good accordance at pH 1.0 and 3.0. As confirmed, ACCS exhibited the best Cd(II) adsorption capacity (134.13 mg g(-1)) at pH 5.0 and even retained considerable adsorption performance under extremely acidic conditions. Additionally, it maintained excellent adsorbability and little weight loss after 5 cycles. Further, the adsorption structure of 2662 type ACCS was determined by quantum molecular (QM) and molecular orbital (MO) investigations. On the basis of this structure, the amidoxime group (-C(NH2)=NOH) was proved to be key in the adsorption process by Mulliken charge analysis and molecular dynamics simulations. Furthermore, the binding energy values clearly indicated that Cd(II) favors binding with C-NH2 over C=N-OH in the amidoxime group. In summary, our interpretation of the overall adsorption mechanism was well quantified by efficient calculations and simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available