4.6 Article

Plasma fluctuations in the scrape-off layer and at the divertor target in Alcator C-Mod and their relationship to divertor collisionality and density shoulder formation

Journal

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND ENERGY
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages 295-299

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2019.02.038

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USDoE Coop., DoE Office of Science [DE-FC02-99ER54512]
  2. Research Council of Norway [240510/F20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experiments indicate that the formation of density shoulders in the far scrape-off layer (SOL) is associated with an increase in cross-field transport and the propagation of coherent structures of high density known as blobs. It has been suggested that far SOL divertor collisionality (Lambda(div)) may be a controlling parameter in this physics, which could be challenging for heat flux mitigation schemes. At Alcator C-Mod, a new high spatial resolution divertor Langmuir probe array (rail probes) combined with a scanning Mirror Langmuir probe has been used to investigate this phenomenon in detail. Experiments were performed to mitigate divertor heat flux and thus increase Lambda(div) by two different methods and observe the divertor and scrape-off layer plasma response: (1) a 3-point density scan is found to increase the fluctuation intermittency at both the midplane and divertor, and produce a density shoulder at elevated Greenwald fraction; (2) a 3-point N-2 seeding scan is found to increase the divertor strike point collisionality, by over two orders of magnitude yet no noticeable trend is observed in either the density profile or the fluctuation statistics. It is concluded that Lambda(div) near the strike point is not by itself a controlling parameter for SOL fluctuations and shoulder formation which is important for localized heat flux mitigation schemes targeting the strike point where heat flux is the greatest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available