3.8 Proceedings Paper

Experimental study of magnesium drilling based on the surface quality

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.014

Keywords

Magnesium alloys; Dry drilling; Minimum quantity lubrication; surface roughness; Factorial design

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [DPI2014-58007-R]
  2. Industrial Engineering School-UNED [REF2016-ICF05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, the use of magnesium and its alloys for transport applications is based on the combination of high mechanical properties and low density. In general, the machinability of these materials is considered to be good. Nevertheless, it has been reported that the machining of these alloys involves some critical problems regarding their tendency to be flammable at high temperatures and consequently, there is a risk of chip ignition in the working area during the process. This fact is especially critical when the size of chips is reduced. In this study, the influence of cutting conditions on surface roughness, in terms of Ra, obtained by drilling of magnesium alloy (AZ91D-F) was carried out. A factorial design 2(4) was employed for the planning of the drilling tests. The factors considered were the feed rate (0.05 and 0.2 mm/r), cutting speed, 40 and 60 m/min, the type of tool, in particular, the point angle of 118 degrees and 135 degrees, and the cooling system, Dry conditions and MQL (Minimum Quantity Lubrication) system. As main conclusions it can be affirmed that improved surface roughness is obtained with the cutting conditions selected in this study. Furthermore, at 0.05 mm/r and 40 m/min the use of tools with a point angle of 135 degrees provides lower values of Ra than the tool of 118 degrees point angle. Slightly lower values of Ra are obtained with tools of 118 degrees point angle at 0.2 mm/r and 60 m/min. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available