4.8 Article

Exploring the effects of inter-firm linkages on SMEs' open innovation from an ecosystem perspective: An empirical study of Chinese manufacturing SMEs

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 118-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.010

Keywords

Open innovation; Innovation ecosystem; Absorptive capability; Prominent organization; Service intermediaries; SMEs

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Youth Foundation of China [71704090]
  2. China National Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610097]
  3. China National Postdoctoral Specific Science Foundation [2018T110110]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we study the effects of inter-firm linkages on the open innovation of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from an innovation ecosystem perspective. Based on resource dependence theory and the bipartite structure of business ecosystems, we divide a SME's external linkages with its partners in an innovation ecosystem into two types (i.e. the Linkages of a SME with its Prominent Organizations (LPO) and the Linkages of the SME with its Service Intermediaries (LSI)). We then examine the relationships between LPO (and LSI) and the SME's innovation performance and analyze the influences of the SME's absorptive capacity on the two relationships. Research results support a positive relationship between LPO and SMEs' innovation performance, and a positive relationship between LSI and SMEs' innovation performance and a positive relationship between LSI and LPO. In addition, research results show that when measured by R&D intensity, SMEs' absorptive capacity weakens the positive effects of LPO (and LSI) on SMEs' innovation performance, whereas when measured by IT adoption, SMEs' absorptive capacity strengthens the two positive relationships. Relevant theoretical and managerial contributions are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available