4.8 Article

Network embeddedness and inbound open innovation practice: The moderating role of technology cluster

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 12-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.018

Keywords

Inbound open innovation practice; Network embeddedness; Technology cluster; Industrial technology concentration ratio

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71572026, 71632004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inbound open innovation has become a prevalent innovation strategy used to strengthen firms' technology competitiveness in the fast-changing industrial and technological environment. The effective governance of firms' ego-centered innovation networks to facilitate and accelerate inbound open innovation practice is the main concern of scholars and firm leaders. In this paper, we elucidate the impact of network embeddedness on inbound open innovation practice by considering technology duster an important moderator. We conduct a patent citation network analysis and a hierarchical regression analysis to empirically study the patent citation data of four emerging high-tech industries according to the stages of their industrial technology development. Our results show that during the initial and growth stages of industrial technology development, the centrality and network reach of a firm's network embeddedness exert a positive impact on the inbound open innovation practice. This relationship is positively moderated by clustering and the bridging ties of the technology cluster in which the firm is involved. During the stable stage, only the network reach improves firms' inbound open innovation practice, while centrality becomes a hazard. Furthermore, clustering decreases the negative effect of centrality and enhances the positive effect of network reach. Bridging ties show no moderating effect. Our findings deepen the understanding of scholars and practitioners regarding how inbound open innovation practice varies in different innovation network settings at both the firm and cluster levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available