4.6 Article

Boosting the hydrogen evolution performance of a ternary MoxCo1-xP nanowire array by tuning the Mo/Co ratio

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 7, Issue 24, Pages 14842-14848

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta04083h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. 973 Programs [2014CB239302]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21773114, 21473091, 21603183, 41702037, 61764001, U1404212]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20171246]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [14380135]
  5. Key Science and Technology Program of Henan Province [162102210306]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It's imperative to develop efficient and low-cost non-noble metal electrocatalysts for the commercial application of the hydrogen evolution reaction under alkaline conditions. Herein, we prepared a series of vertical MoxCo1-xP nanowire arrays on carbon cloth as an efficient HER catalyst. The electrocatalytic activity is strongly influenced by the Mo/Co ratio which is thought to be related to the changes in the electronic structure and the lattice structure due to the elemental substitution of Mo for Co. Density functional theory calculations reveal that the existence of Mo optimizes the free energy of hydrogen adsorption on the electrocatalyst surface. Meanwhile, the introduction of Mo damages the intrinsic crystal structure and generates a high density of lattice boundaries, which hinders the conductivity of the catalyst. Therefore, a typical volcano-like variation of the electrocatalytic activity was observed in MoxCo1-xP with an increasing Mo/Co ratio. The catalyst (Mo0.25Co0.75P) with optimal Mo/Co = 0.25:0.75 exhibits outstanding HER performance. It requires an overpotential of 59 mV to achieve 10 mA cm(-2) and possesses long-term durability for 50 hours in 1.0 M KOH. This study offers a promising low-cost catalyst for practical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available