3.9 Article

An updated catalog of pre-hispanic archaeomagnetic data for north and central Mesoamerica: Implications for the regional paleosecular variation reference curve

Journal

BOLETIN DE LA SOCIEDAD GEOLOGICA MEXICANA
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages 497-518

Publisher

UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO, INST GEOGRAFIA
DOI: 10.18268/BSGM2019v71n2a16

Keywords

Archaeomagnetic dating; geomagnetic field; paleosecular variation; central Mexico

Categories

Funding

  1. CONACYT [252149]
  2. UNAM-PAPIIT [IN101717]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the immense cultural heritage of Mesoamerica, there is still no reference archaeomagnetic curve available for Central Mexico and adjacent areas. The present research has two simultaneous objectives: to obtain finer characteristics of the geomagnetic field elements over archaeological past, and to build up a reliable regional archaeomagnetic dating tool for the time span of 350 BC. to 1500 Al). For these purposes. 72 previous were compiled and analyzed with 40 new data selected from unpublished reports and theses performed in the paleomagnetic laboratories of the Geophysics Institute of UNAM (CDMX and Morelia). Most of the samples carry thermo-remanent magnetization, 31 cases were unburned stuccos, and 3 mural paintings carrying detrital or pictorial remanent magnetization. A total of 112 archaeomagnetic directions constitute the core of the updated catalogue. Special effort should be paid for to the time intervals of 500 BC.-A.D. 200 and AD. 1200-325 where there is a major lack of reliable archaeomagnetic results. The present paleosecular variation curve agrees reasonably well with the fluctuation observed in the SW United States area. The differences in the intervals between Al). 600-720, Al). 850 and 1000 and AD. 1200-1325 may be rather attributed to the lack of reliable data than to local non-dipole field. It is urgent to gather a greater number of high-quality data supported by radiometric ages to improve the reference curve in both regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available