4.3 Article

Everyone Has a Role: Perspectives of Service Users With First-Episode Psychosis, Family Caregivers, Treatment Providers, and Policymakers on Responsibility for Supporting Individuals With Mental Health Problems

Journal

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 1299-1312

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1049732318812422

Keywords

mental health and illness; responsibility; adolescents; youth; young adults; schizophrenia; psychosis; recovery; support needs; adaptation; coping; enduring; agency; families; policy; policy analysis; health; access to health care; teamwork; health care; power; empowerment; qualitative description; Canada

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [MH093303]
  2. CIHR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Varying perceptions of who should be responsible for supporting individuals with mental health problems may contribute to their needs remaining unmet. A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore these perceptions among key stakeholders. Focus groups were conducted with 13 service users, 12 family members, and 18 treatment providers from an early psychosis intervention program in Montreal, Canada. Individual interviews were conducted with six mental health policy-/decision-makers. Participants across stakeholder groups assigned a range of responsibilities to individuals with mental health problems, stakeholders in these individuals' immediate and extended social networks (e.g., families), macro-level stakeholders with influence (e.g., government), and society as a whole. Perceived failings of the health care system and the need for greater sharing of roles and responsibilities also emerged as important themes. Our findings suggest that different stakeholders should collectively assume certain responsibilities and that systems-level failings may contribute to unmet needs for mental health support.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available