4.8 Article

Partial cation substitution reduces iodide ion transport in lead iodide perovskite solar cells

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 2264-2272

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ee00476a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Archer/HPC facilities through the Materials Chemistry Consortium [EP/L000202]
  2. University of Bath
  3. Centre for Doctoral Training in Sustainable Chemical Technologies [EP/L016354/1]
  4. Centre for Doctoral Training in New and Sustainable Photovoltaics [EP/LO1551X/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/H026304/1]
  6. Energy Oriented Centre of Excellence within the European Union Horizon2020 framework [676629]
  7. EPSRC [EP/R020485/1, EP/K016288/1, EP/H026304/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Halide perovskite solar cells containing a mixture of A-site cations are attracting considerable interest due to their improved stability and high power conversion efficiencies. Ionic transport is known to be an important predictor of perovskite behaviour, but the impact of partial A-site substitution on iodide ion diffusion is poorly understood. Here, we combine ab initio modelling, impedance spectroscopy and muon spin relaxation to investigate the effect on iodide ion transport of incorporating a low concentration of each of seven different sized cations (from small rubidium to large guanidinium) into methylammonium lead iodide. Experimental and simulation results are in good agreement, indicating that these cation substitutions increase the activation energy for iodide ion diffusion. We show for the first time that partial guanidinium substitution into methylammonium lead iodide strongly suppresses iodide ion transport. The insights gained from this multi-technique study are important for the future design of mixed-cation perovskite solar cells with enhanced performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available