4.6 Article

In Operando Impedance Based Diagnostics of Electrode Kinetics in Li-Ion Pouch Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 166, Issue 10, Pages A2131-A2141

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.1191910jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Texas Instruments (TI) University Research Partnership program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A key to understanding the coupled electrochemical and transport processes in Li-ion batteries is to distinguish the complex interactions between the electrode pair. In this study, an in operando impedance based diagnostics for a three-electrode Li-ion pouch cell configuration is presented in order to study the individual electrode kinetics under varying operating temperatures and depths of discharge. The electrochemical processes including intercalation, diffusion, and interfacial reactions occur at different timescales. Impedance analytics allows estimating the resistances and activation energies of different processes to identify the limiting mechanisms in each electrode. It was found that at -5 degrees C, the effect of staging in the graphite electrode manifests as a piece-wise dependence of the pore resistance and the double layer capacitance in the anode. The dense and highly ordered stages 1, 2 of graphite exhibit higher ionic resistance than the disordered (2L, 3L, and 4L) stages at -5 degrees C, due to the added contribution of pore transport resistance at higher depths of discharge. (c) The Author(s) 2019. Published by ECS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License (CC BY-NC-ND, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is not changed in any way and is properly cited. For permission for commercial reuse, please email: oa@electrochem.org.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available