4.3 Article

Removal of cephalexin from artificial wastewater by mesoporous silica materials using Box-Behnken response surface methodology

Journal

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 169-180

Publisher

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2019.24109

Keywords

Adsorption; Cephalexin; Mesoporous silica; Box-Behnken response surface methodology

Funding

  1. Birjand University of Medical Sciences
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesoporous silica such as MCM-41 was used as an adsorbent for the removal of cephalexin antibiotic from synthetic wastewater. In this study, MCM-41 adsorbent was synthesised and was characterised by FE-SEM, XRD, FTIR and isotherms of adsorption/desorption of N-2. The effects of initial pH, adsorbent dose, initial adsorbate concentration, contact time and temperature on process efficiency were evaluated using Box-Behnken statistical experiment design (RSM). FTIR analysis revealed the Si-OH, H-O-H and Si-O-Si bonds are formed. According to BET surface area, MCM-41 had pores with a diameter of more than 2.0 nm and surface area of 1,097 m(2)g(-1) and also XRD spectra showed the mean crystallite size of MCM-41 was 75 nm. The statistical results show that pH, adsorbent dose, initial antibiotic concentration, temperature and quadratic pH were significant and presented with probability < 0.05. The optimum removal condition based on analysis of variance and the quadratic model was the initial pH of adsorbate solution fixed at 3.00, adsorbent dose 800 mg L-1, the initial concentration of antibiotic at 50.0 mg L-1, a temperature of 40.0 degrees C, and at the adsorption time of 30.0 min. Under these conditions, the percentage removal of cephalexin antibiotic was 90.3%. Therefore, according to the obtained results, the mesoporous silica can be used to adsorb cephalexin antibiotic in optimal conditions designed by response surface methodology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available