4.7 Article

Dual detection of bioaccumulated Hg2+ based on luminescent bacteria and aggregation-induced emission

Journal

CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 55, Issue 52, Pages 7458-7461

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9cc02782c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21788102, 51620105009, 21877040, 21602063, U1801252]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [201804020060, 201607020015, 201704030069]
  3. Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou [201806010152]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030313852, 2016A030312002]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018JQ01]
  6. outstanding Scholar Program of Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory [2018GZR110102001]
  7. Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong [ITC-CNERC14SC01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of a sensitive and reliable method for the detection of bioaccumulated heavy metal toxins is highly desirable for biotoxicity evaluation. However, the conventional biotoxicity evaluation method based on luminescent bacteria suffers from only being able to detect the overall toxicity without selectivity in light-off detection mode. Although various synthetic fluorescent probes have been developed for the selective detection of heavy metal ions, they usually suffer from aggregation-caused quenching after local accumulation in biological systems. To tackle these challenges, we herein develop a dual detection strategy for bioaccumulated Hg2+ based on turn-off of the bioluminescence of P. phosphoreum bacteria by disrupting the quorum sensing system and turn-on of the photoluminescence of an aggregation-induced emission (AIE) probe by forming aggregates with Hg2+ inside the bacteria. It is expected that the dual detection strategy would find broad applications in the evaluation of bioaccumulated toxins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available