4.7 Article

Tracking the behavior of Maillard browning in lysine/arginine-sugar model systems under high hydrostatic pressure

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 97, Issue 15, Pages 5168-5175

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8398

Keywords

Maillard reaction; high hydrostatic pressure; lysine-sugar model; arginine-sugar model

Funding

  1. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2013DFG31380]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA102205]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, China [20133ACB20009]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology [SKLF-ZZA-201612]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31660436, 31660443]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDHigh-pressure processing is gaining popularity in the food industry. However, its effect on the Maillard reaction during high-pressure-assisted pasteurization and sterilization is not well documented. This study aimed to investigate the effects of high hydrostatic pressure on the Maillard reaction during these processes using amino acid (lysine or arginine)-sugar (glucose or fructose) solution models. RESULTSHigh pressure retarded the intermediate and final stages of the Maillard reaction in the lysine-sugar model. For the lysine-glucose model, the degradation rate of Amadori compounds was decelerated, while acceleration was observed in the arginine-sugar model. Increased temperature not only accelerated the Maillard reaction over time but also formed fluorescent compounds with different emission wavelengths. Lysine reacted with the sugars more readily than arginine under the same conditions. In addition, it was easier for lysine to react with glucose, whereas arginine reacted more readily with fructose under high pressure. CONCLUSIONHigh pressure exerts different effects on lysine-sugar and arginine-sugar models. (c) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available