Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 413-432Publisher
PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
DOI: 10.1057/s41287-018-0161-4
Keywords
Smallholders; Adaptation; Wealth groups; Ethiopia; Africa
Categories
Funding
- Danish government
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Debates on adaptation in rural Africa rarely consider how responses to climate variability vary by wealth group. This study examines differences across wealth groups based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis triangulated with participatory methods. Results indicate that perceptions of weather variability and extreme events are detected by most households regardless of wealth status. The most common responses-using drought-resistant crops and changing planting dates-are also similar across groups. However, there are significant differences in the type of adaptation options adopted by wealthier and poorer farmers: the former intensify agriculture through improved seed varieties, fertiliser and manure; the latter depend on craft activities, seasonal migration and support from relatives and neighbours. Overall, our findings suggest that measuring asset holdings could allow a differentiated approach to supporting adaptation across socio-economic groups in rural regions in Ethiopia and Africa more broadly.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available