4.7 Article

Effect of deamidation-induced modification on umami and bitter taste of wheat gluten hydrolysates

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 97, Issue 10, Pages 3181-3188

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8162

Keywords

wheat gluten; deamidation; umami taste; bitter taste; electronic tongue

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA102201]
  2. Key R&D Programs of Jiangsu Province [BE2015327]
  3. Jiangsu Province 'Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Grain Circulation and Safety' Industry Development Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDBitter taste is the main limiting factor for various applications of protein hydrolysates. Frequently used physicochemical methods for debittering protein hydrolysates come with some undesired side effects. Deamidation-induced modification would be a very promising technique to improve the flavor of wheat gluten hydrolysates (WGHs). This study was designed to determine the effect of deamidation with certain enzymes or acid treatment on the chemical composition, bitterness and umami properties of WGHs. The difference between umami peptide and free glutamic acid on the suppression of bitterness is emphatically discussed. The optimal scheme is proposed based on the flavor of WGHs and the yield of peptides. RESULTSThe generation of umami substances suppressed bitter signal transduction. When the content of umami substances was relatively high, the umami-enhancing properties of umami peptides were obviously effective. The intensity of umami taste was high enough to further suppress bitter taste in the course of neurocognitive functioning. CONCLUSIONWhen WGHs were treated with Glutaminase for 180min, the umami taste score increased from 1.62 to 4.27 and the bitter taste score decreased from 1.33 to 0.65. (c) 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available