4.6 Review

Addressing current challenges in cancer immunotherapy with mathematical and computational modelling

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 14, Issue 131, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0150

Keywords

cancer immunotherapy; mathematical modelling; optimal control

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health postdoctoral fellowship [F32CA214030]
  2. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [1R1R01CA188025-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of cancer immunotherapy is to boost a patient's immune response to a tumour. Yet, the design of an effective immunotherapy is complicated by various factors, including a potentially immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment, immune-modulating effects of conventional treatments and therapy-related toxicities. These complexities can be incorporated into mathematical and computational models of cancer immunotherapy that can then be used to aid in rational therapy design. In this review, we survey modelling approaches under the umbrella of the major challenges facing immunotherapy development, which encompass tumour classification, optimal treatment scheduling and combination therapy design. Although overlapping, each challenge has presented unique opportunities for modellers to make contributions using analytical and numerical analysis of model outcomes, as well as optimization algorithms. We discuss several examples of models that have grown in complexity as more biological information has become available, showcasing how model development is a dynamic process interlinked with the rapid advances in tumour-immune biology. We conclude the review with recommendations for modellers both with respect to methodology and biological direction that might help keep modellers at the forefront of cancer immunotherapy development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available