4.8 Review

Challenges and recent progress in the design of advanced electrode materials for rechargeable Mg batteries

Journal

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages 118-138

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.11.033

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771058, 51771236]
  2. Characteristic Innovation Project of Guangdong Province Education Department Grant [2016KTSCX032]
  3. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme
  4. Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hunan Province [2018JJ1038]
  5. Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2017CX002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The constantly increasing demands on sustainable and high-performance energy storage devices generate tremendous research attentions on novel battery systems. Rechargeable magnesium battery (RMB), which possesses the advantages of low cost, natural abundance, has emerged as a considerable candidate. The fascinating features of high volumetric capacity, dendrites free and earth abundance also made it more fascinating. However, owing to the strong polarization of Mg ions, the existing electrodes and electrolyte cannot fully facilitate the Mg2+ ion insertion/extraction. In this regard, finding suitable electrode materials and electrolytes with high Mg insertion kinetics, excellent reversibility and costless are still the challenges that hinder the practical application of RMB. In this review, we mainly attempt to accumulate the recently advances in the development of electrodes, as well as development of advanced hybrid RMB systems. The review specifically aimed to provide new perspectives on the construction of novel electrode materials. Moreover, the challenges and perspective of RMBs are also discussed to highlight the limitations and the future direction. These may inspire more efforts on future work and accelerate the development process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available