4.7 Article

Identification of a thermostable fungal lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase and evaluation of its effect on lignocellulosic degradation

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 14, Pages 5739-5750

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-09928-3

Keywords

Auxiliary activity family 9; Heterologous expression; Product profile; Synergism; Thermostability

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1501701]
  2. Key Technologies R&D Program of Shandong Province [2018GSF12021]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570040, 31870785]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Auxiliary activity family 9 (AA9) lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) show significant synergism with cellulase in cellulose degradation. In recent years, there have been many reports on AA9 LPMOs; however, the identification of efficient and thermostable AA9 LPMOs with broad potential for industrial applications remains necessary. In this study, a new AA9 LPMO from Talaromyces cellulolyticus, named TcAA9A, was identified. An analysis of the oxidation products of phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose categorized TcAA9A as a type 3 AA9 LPMO, and TcAA9A exhibited a better synergistic effect with cellulase from Trichoderma reesei than what is seen with TaAA9A, a well-studied AA9 LPMO from Thermoascus aurantiacus. Two AA9 LPMOs were successfully expressed in T. reesei, and the transformants were named Tr-TcAA9A and Tr-TaAA9A. The activities and thermostabilities of the AA9 LPMOs in Tr-TcAA9A were higher than those of the AA9 LPMOs in Tr-TaAA9A or the parent. The enzyme solution of Tr-TcAA9A was more efficient than that of the parent or Tr-TaAA9A for the degradation of Avicel and delignified corncob residue. Thus, TcAA9A showed a better performance than TaAA9A in T. reesei cellulase cocktails. This study may offer an innovative solution for improving enzyme cocktail activity for lignocellulosic degradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available