4.5 Review

Migraine affects 1 in 10 people worldwide featuring recent rise: A systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies involving 6 million participants

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 372, Issue -, Pages 307-315

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.11.071

Keywords

Migraine; Epidemiology; Community-based studies; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Prevalence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To study the weighted average global prevalence of migraine at the community level. Study design and setting: A systematic review using advanced search strategies employing PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for community-based and non-clinical studies by combining the terms migraine, community-based, and names of every country worldwide spanning all previous years from January 1, 1920 until August 31, 2015. Methods were in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A meta-analysis with subgroup analysis was performed to identify pooled migraine prevalence and examine cohort heterogeneity. Results: A total of 302 community-based studies involving 6,216,995 participants (median age 35 years, male-to female ratio of 0.91) were included. Global migraine prevalence was 11.6% (95% Cl 10.7-12.6%; random effects); 10.4% in Africa, 10.1% in Asia, 11.4% in Europe, 9.7% in North America, 16.4% in Central and South America. When the pooled cohort was stratified, the prevalence was 13.8% among females, 6.9% among males, 11.2% among urban residents, 8.4% among rural residents, and 12.4% among school/college students. Our result showed a pattern of rising global migraine prevalence. Conclusion: Migraine affects one in ten people worldwide featuring recent rise. Higher prevalence was found among females, students, and urban residents. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available