4.6 Article

Pharmacological Approaches to Delaying Disability Progression in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Journal

DRUGS
Volume 75, Issue 9, Pages 947-977

Publisher

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-015-0411-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bayer Vital GmbH
  2. Bayer Schering AG
  3. Biogen Idec
  4. CSL Behring
  5. Fresenius Medical Care
  6. Genzyme
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. GW Pharmaceuticals
  9. Lundbeck
  10. Merck Serono
  11. Omniamed
  12. Novartis
  13. Sanofi Aventis
  14. Sanofi Aventis Germany
  15. Sanofi US
  16. Bayer
  17. Bayer Schering
  18. MSD
  19. Novo Nordisk
  20. Sanofi-Aventis
  21. Teva
  22. Novartis Pharma AG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In individuals with multiple sclerosis, physical and cognitive disability progression are clinical and pathophysiological hallmarks of the disease. Despite shortcomings, particularly in capturing cognitive deficits, the Expanded Disability Status Scale is the assessment of disability progression most widely used in clinical trials. Here, we review treatment effects on disability that have been reported in large clinical trials of disease-modifying treatment, both among patients with relapsing-remitting disease and among those with progressive disease. However, direct comparisons are confounded to some degree by the lack of consistency in assessment of disability progression across trials. Confirmed disability progression (CDP) is a more robust measure when performed over a 6-month than a 3-month interval, and reduction in the risk of 6-month CDP in phase III trials provides good evidence for the beneficial effects on disability of several high-efficacy treatments for relapsing-remitting disease. It is also becoming increasingly clear that therapies effective in relapsing-remitting disease have little impact on the course of progressive disease. Given that the pathophysiological mechanisms, which lead to the long-term accrual of physical and cognitive deficits, are evident at the earliest stages of disease, it remains a matter of debate whether the most effective therapies are administered early enough to afford patients the best long-term outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available