4.7 Article

Theoretical Assessment of the Effect of Vertical Dispersivity on Coastal Seawater Radium Distribution

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00357

Keywords

submarine groundwater discharge; radium; dispersion; vertical mixing; seawater

Funding

  1. CSIRO Land Water

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trends in radium (Ra) activity in coastal seawater are frequently used to infer submarine groundwater discharge. In general, unlike in the deep oceans, Ra samples are only collected from the surface of the mixed layer in coastal areas. The assumption is that the water column is well mixed, as often evidenced by uniform temperature and salinity profiles. However, if the timescale for vertical mixing is similar to or less than the timescale for radioactive decay, the vertical profiles in Ra activity may not be uniform. In the present work, a two-dimensional dispersion model was developed to evaluate the potential effects of slow vertical mixing on Ra distribution in the mixed layer of an inner shelf. The variables considered were the vertical coefficient of solute dispersivity (K-z), the offshore coefficient of solute dispersivity (K-x), the coastal Ra flux (F-o), the benthic Ra flux (F-B), and the slope of the seabed. The shorter-lived Ra isotopes (Ra-223 and Ra-224 ; t(1/2) = 3.66 and 11.4 days, respectively) were sensitive to K-z when its value was low (<10(-4) m(2) s(-1)), resulting in complex activity patterns in the water column as a function of the other variables. Ra-228 (t(1/2 )= 5.75 years) was only moderately impacted by low K-z but the long-lived Ra-226 (t(1/)(2) = 1600 years) was insensitive to K-z. Surface water samples may not always be representative of water column Ra activity when K-z is low, which will need to be taken into account in future field programs for seawater Ra distribution in shelf environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available