4.6 Article

Effect of accelerated aging on dental zirconia-based materials

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.08.023

Keywords

Flexural strength; Phase transformation; Nanoindentation; Surface topography

Funding

  1. Faculty of Dentistry Summer Student Research Program
  2. Dr De Souza's University of Toronto Start-up fund
  3. Dr De Souza's Start-up fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the effect of aging on phase transformation and mechanical properties of yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP). Materials and methods: Fully-sintered Y-TZP slabs, IPS E-max ZirCAD (ZC - Ivoclar) and Z-5 ceramic (Z5- C5 Medical Werks), were artificially aged in autoclave for: 0, 30, 60 or 90 min. Flexural strength (FS), crystalline changes (X-ray diffraction analysis - XRD) and surface topography were analyzed. 0 and 90 min-aged samples were evaluated by nanoindentation to measure hardness and modulus, and results were compared using Wilcoxan Mann Whitney rank sum test (p <= 0.05). FS results were compared using two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD (alpha=0.05). Results: Material factor had significant effect (p=0.001) on flexural strength (Z5=966.95 MPa; ZC=847.82 MPa), but aging did not. Nanoindentation showed incidence of typical load/depth curves combined with some exhibiting features compatible with cracking. When typical curves were considered, aging had no effect on the modulus and hardness, but hardness was dependent on material type. A steady increase in the in phase related to aging time was observed for ZC samples. The maximum incidence of in phase was 6.56% for Z5/60 min. Significance: Flexural strength is not affected by surface transformation in dental Y-TZP. Hydrothermal aging has an effect on m content and surface topography of different zirconia brands, but mechanical tests that can precisely characterize surface changes in aged Y-TZP are still missing. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available